Public-Private Dialogue

A website of the OPEN PRIVATE SECTOR platform
Created by the World Bank, moderated by CIPE.

Created by the World Bank, moderated by CIPE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • HOME
  • LESSONS LEARNED
  • COUNTRY CASES
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Eurasia
    • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • TOOLS
    • PPD Charter
    • PPD Handbook
    • Monitoring and Evaluations
      • The Evaluation Wheel/The Reform Process Table
      • The PPD Reform Tracking Tool
      • Monitoring and Evaluation for Business Environment Reform: A Handbook for Practitioners
      • The PPD Performance Indicators for Donors
    • Operational Resources
      • Manual for Trainers on PPD and Good Governance
      • Quick Guides to Integrating Public-Private Dialogue
      • Key Documents for Setting up PPD Projects
  • WORKSHOP 2015
    • Past Workshops
      • Workshop 2014
      • Workshop 2011
      • Workshop 2010
      • Workshop 2009
      • Workshop 2008
      • Workshop 2007
      • Workshop 2006
  • eLEARNING
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Contact
You are here: Home / Lessons Learned / Business Associations, Business Climate, and Economic Growth: Evidence from Transition Economies

Business Associations, Business Climate, and Economic Growth: Evidence from Transition Economies

Pages from IP 08-07 ISNIE

Interest groups are rarely portrayed in a positive light. In economic theories of regulation, collective action, and rent-seeking, interest groups are commonly perceived as seeking some form of redistribution through a political process. For example, the economic theory of regulation advanced by Stigler and Peltzman has been called the capture theory of regulation to reflect the idea that interest groups exert influence over policymakers, effectively capturing the legislative process. Although Olson’s work on the logic of collective action concentrates on the inner-workings of interest groups, it also develops a rather negative view of such groups as seeking protection for members, leading him to later declare that interest groups stifle economic growth in societies where they proliferate. A few theories argue to the contrary; interest groups can be beneficial in the provision of public goods in instances where markets fail to provide them.6 However, interest groups in the private sector – business associations, chambers of commerce, trade groups, and others – are most commonly portrayed as lobbying for some set of benefits for their members at the expense of other groups, whether they are subsidies, trade protection, or price breaks.

The transition process in Central and Eastern Europe in the late 1980s to early 1990s brought to the forefront a new set of questions in regards to the role that interest groups can play. As countries began to explore free markets and mechanisms to put them in place after decades of command-style economic disasters, private-sector interest groups emerged as primary participants in this process. In some instances, state-created chambers of commerce acted as guardians of insider firms’ interests in the political process. In others, newly formed business organizations sought ways in which they could solve the collective action problem and engage the nascent private sector in the policymaking process.

The success of these countries that restructured fundamental institutions and built new ones is becoming increasingly evident.7 For example, countries in Central and Eastern Europe are rapidly moving towards full integration with the global economy, while Central Asian countries and some other former Soviet Republics are increasingly isolated. In many cases, private-sector interest groups were participants in successful reform efforts. Acting as the liaison between policymakers and economic agents, business associations and chambers of commerce channeled information and reform recommendations from businesspeople, facilitating the development of a business-friendly environment. These associations emerged as engines of economic growth and development, seeking to increase the size of the economic pie through the political process, rather than simply trying to capture a larger share at the expense of others.

This paper explores how firms, represented by business associations, can provide information and create political support for rules that foster a better business climate. Global criteria used by the Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE) is presented to identify market-promoting interest groups and a process to develop a business-friendly policy environment. A further look into the case studies of market-promoting associations in Romania and Russia provides concrete examples.

    John D. Sullivan, Executive Director, CIPE; Kim Eric Bettcher, Knowledge Management Officer, CIPE; Aleksandr Shkolnikov, Senior Global Program Officer,CIPE; August 31, 2008

    Paper at a Glance

    • The link between business associations and economic growth in the transitional economies of Central and Eastern Europe is re-examined through the prism of new institutional economics.
    • By promoting a better business climate, market-enhancing business associations can help to build the foundation for economic growth.
    • The Center for International Private Enterprise’s (CIPE) seven-step reform agenda process is a powerful tool for advancing business associations’ participation in policy making.
    • Case examples from CIPE programs in Romania and Russia illustrate how associations can solve the collective action problem.
  • Download >> PDF (249k)

    Latest Tweets

    • Loading tweets...

    Follow @PPDialogue

    In Partnership With

    CIPE World Bank Group International Finance Corporation DfID GIZ OECD

    About | Legal | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

    All Rights Reserved © 2016

    Copyright © 2023 · Genesis Sample Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in