Public-Private Dialogue

A website of the OPEN PRIVATE SECTOR platform
Created by the World Bank, moderated by CIPE.

Created by the World Bank, moderated by CIPE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • HOME
  • LESSONS LEARNED
  • COUNTRY CASES
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Eurasia
    • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • TOOLS
    • PPD Charter
    • PPD Handbook
    • Monitoring and Evaluations
      • The Evaluation Wheel/The Reform Process Table
      • The PPD Reform Tracking Tool
      • Monitoring and Evaluation for Business Environment Reform: A Handbook for Practitioners
      • The PPD Performance Indicators for Donors
    • Operational Resources
      • Manual for Trainers on PPD and Good Governance
      • Quick Guides to Integrating Public-Private Dialogue
      • Key Documents for Setting up PPD Projects
  • WORKSHOP 2015
    • Past Workshops
      • Workshop 2014
      • Workshop 2011
      • Workshop 2010
      • Workshop 2009
      • Workshop 2008
      • Workshop 2007
      • Workshop 2006
  • eLEARNING
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Contact

Transformational Leadership Wanted

March 17, 2017 by Anna Nadgrodkiewicz Leave a Comment

In today’s world of polarized politics, divisions within societies struggling with the history of divisions feel particularly deep. Countries emerging from conflict, such as Colombia or South Sudan, are striving to make progress toward non-violence and reconciliation. Even in peaceful, mature democracies, the public discourse has become more partisan and polarized than ever. As countries look for transformative leadership to overcome divisions, they struggle with building effective coalitions that could overcome differences and find consensus in key areas.

In this context, the 2017 Global Leadership Forum, focused on “Building Leadership for Reform in Divided Societies” and hosted by the World Bank in Washington, DC, came at a very opportune time. The event brought together about 200 partners, leaders and practitioners from government, academia, civil society, and international development organizations working on collaborative leadership. I had the privilege of representing CIPE as one of the members of the Global Partnership on Collaborative Leadership for Development (GPCL4D).

The Forum is the second in a series of events organized by the GPCL4D that puts leadership and coalitions at the center of international development. The discussion and exchange of practical approaches built on the lessons from last year. My main takeaways this time revolve around four key ideas:

– Conflict is not necessarily bad if managed properly. In international development, conflict is usually narrowly equated with violence. Yet, conflict has a broader and more universal meaning – disagreement, clash of ideas, difference of opinion. In that sense, it is a fundamental and unavoidable part of a human condition. The key question is: how to manage disagreements so that they lead to constructive progress rather than a destructive downward spiral? Inclusive democracy is the best way we have to reconcile competing interests and arrive at joint solutions.
– Resolving conflict is about trust. Trust has been a word uttered frequently during the Forum. Indeed, without trusting the other side it is difficult to make concessions and come up with a compromise. Still, in many situations that level of trust is hard to find given painful histories of (sometimes bloody) conflict. In these cases, it is crucial to create mechanisms that make trust in the process possible even if the parties at the table do not necessarily trust each other. This approach has been successfully used in Colombia’s peace negotiations, for instance.
– Toxic leaders are not monolithic. All too often, public-private dialogue over a policy issue falls apart with one side accusing the other of toxic behavior – a combination of self-centered attitudes, motivations, and actions. Nonetheless, it is important to seek common ground even with the most uncooperative leaders. They may not be equally intransigent on all issues. Their views may also evolve over time as circumstances change, especially if they face a well-organized coalition of stakeholders who speak in one voice on an important issue. We have seen this approach work in a number of countries where the private sector managed to constructively engage with otherwise uncooperative governments.
–Technocratic solutions are not enough. When approaching a situation of conflict, donors often bring to the table solutions based on international best practices and objective prescriptions. These can be useful elements of the conversation that steer it in a positive direction. However, it is unrealistic to expect that the technocratic solution will be simply accepted on its merits by parties that deeply disagree and often distrust each other. They must first develop a mindset open to new ideas and compromise. The key role of a donor as a good mediator is to help the conflicted parties cultivate this mindset, not just to recommend even the soundest of solutions.

I thoroughly enjoyed the 2017 Forum, which provided a unique opportunity for practitioners to interact and share lessons learned. For those who were unable to attend, the sessions are available online, and more information about the GPCL4D can be found on its website throughout the year.

Anna Kompanek is Director of Multiregional Programs at CIPE..

Tweet

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Upcoming Events

  • 9th PPD Workshop in Tunis, Tunisia May 9-11, 2017

Latest Tweets

  • Loading tweets...

Follow @PPDialogue

In Partnership With

CIPE World Bank Group International Finance Corporation DfID GIZ OECD

About | Legal | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

All Rights Reserved © 2016

Copyright © 2023 · Genesis Sample Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in