Public-Private Dialogue

A website of the OPEN PRIVATE SECTOR platform
Created by the World Bank, moderated by CIPE.

Created by the World Bank, moderated by CIPE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • HOME
  • LESSONS LEARNED
  • COUNTRY CASES
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Eurasia
    • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • TOOLS
    • PPD Charter
    • PPD Handbook
    • Monitoring and Evaluations
      • The Evaluation Wheel/The Reform Process Table
      • The PPD Reform Tracking Tool
      • Monitoring and Evaluation for Business Environment Reform: A Handbook for Practitioners
      • The PPD Performance Indicators for Donors
    • Operational Resources
      • Manual for Trainers on PPD and Good Governance
      • Quick Guides to Integrating Public-Private Dialogue
      • Key Documents for Setting up PPD Projects
  • WORKSHOP 2015
    • Past Workshops
      • Workshop 2014
      • Workshop 2011
      • Workshop 2010
      • Workshop 2009
      • Workshop 2008
      • Workshop 2007
      • Workshop 2006
  • eLEARNING
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Contact
You are here: Home / Tools / PPD Handbook / F. Annexes / D – MONITORING AND EVALUATION / ANNEX D1: Sample structure for terms of reference for a PPD evaluation

ANNEX D1: Sample structure for terms of reference for a PPD evaluation

ANNEX D1: Sample structure for terms of reference for a PPD evaluation

1. Background
Describe the relationship between the organization(s) commissioning the evaluation and the project to be evaluated. Describe the project, including its location, main objectives, target groups and organizational context. Indicate assistance provided by donors and other sources, main results achieved, and core elements of the project’s approach. Describe the reasons for the evaluation.

2. Objectives
Define the objectives of the evaluation. Be aware of the danger of confusing the objectives of the study with the objectives of the project to be studied.

3. Methodology
Include necessary technology, timing, organization, etc. Concentrate on the essentials, giving scope to the consultant to make use of their own experience, expertise and creativity.

4. Scope

Define the size of the focus, in terms of sample size and/or time available. Specify types of expert that will be required and how much time will be needed from each. Break down the time expected to be taken by preparation, study and reporting. Indicate which posts are expected to be filled by local evaluators and which by international evaluators.

When the evaluation is intended to feed into a larger evaluation, specify the relationship of the two. Often it is helpful to indicate the type of conclusions or recommendations expected.

5. Deliverables

Specify dates when an intermediate report should be ready, the number of draft reports to be presented and the dates on which this should be done, and the date on which the final report should be ready. Specify how many reports will be delivered to which parties and in which languages. This might include a table of contents and an indication of page count.

If necessary, specify any other deliverables – final or intermediate –such as briefing and debriefing meetings, or presentation of preliminary findings at the end of the stay of the mission team.

6. Support
Specify support services that will be available – data, reports, transportation, equipment and staff.

7. Competencies
Specify competencies required for each consultant, preferably identifying knowledge-based, experience based and behavioral competencies. If a team of consultants is sought, this section could also specify a required mix of gender, ethnicity or local and international consultants.

8. Budget
Budgets are not always specified as they may be confidential. But budget items relevant for consultants should be specified, such as allowances for travel or communication costs.

9. Bibliography
Indicate relevant available documentation and where it can be obtained.

Sample structure for terms of reference for a PPD evaluation

  • Download >> PDF (68k)

    Table of Contents

    ANNEX D1: Sample structure for terms of reference for a PPD evaluation

    ANNEX D2: Most Significant Change interviews – Interview format

    ANNEX D3: Most Significant Change interviews – Interview template

    ANNEX D4: Instructions for drawing the evaluation wheel

    ANNEX D5: Evaluation wheel questionnaire to stakeholders

    ANNEX D6: Evaluation wheel – template

    Rights & Permissions

    The material in this work is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The sponsors of the work encourage dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission promptly.

    For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, www.copyright.com. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the World Bank, DFID or the OECD Development Center.

    ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
    Small and Medium Enterprise Department
    The World Bank Group

    Latest Tweets

    • Loading tweets...

    Follow @PPDialogue

    In Partnership With

    CIPE World Bank Group International Finance Corporation DfID GIZ OECD

    About | Legal | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

    All Rights Reserved © 2016

    Copyright © 2023 · Genesis Sample Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in