Public-Private Dialogue

A website of the OPEN PRIVATE SECTOR platform
Created by the World Bank, moderated by CIPE.

Created by the World Bank, moderated by CIPE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • HOME
  • LESSONS LEARNED
  • COUNTRY CASES
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Eurasia
    • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • TOOLS
    • PPD Charter
    • PPD Handbook
    • Monitoring and Evaluations
      • The Evaluation Wheel/The Reform Process Table
      • The PPD Reform Tracking Tool
      • Monitoring and Evaluation for Business Environment Reform: A Handbook for Practitioners
      • The PPD Performance Indicators for Donors
    • Operational Resources
      • Manual for Trainers on PPD and Good Governance
      • Quick Guides to Integrating Public-Private Dialogue
      • Key Documents for Setting up PPD Projects
  • WORKSHOP 2015
    • Past Workshops
      • Workshop 2014
      • Workshop 2011
      • Workshop 2010
      • Workshop 2009
      • Workshop 2008
      • Workshop 2007
      • Workshop 2006
  • eLEARNING
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Contact
You are here: Home / Tools / PPD Handbook / F. Annexes / D – MONITORING AND EVALUATION / ANNEX D5: Evaluation wheel questionnaire to stakeholders

ANNEX D5: Evaluation wheel questionnaire to stakeholders

ANNEX D5: Evaluation wheel – questionnaire to stakeholders

Please give your personal opinion on each question, expressing your answer on a scale of 0 to 5. If you are not well informed enough to offer an opinion, please score 0.

Mandate and institutional alignment– What were/are the objectives of the PPD and what was/is its mandate towards the Government and the private sector? How does it fit with current institutions?
# Sub-question Scale Your score
1 Do you know if your PPD has a mission statement and if so how satisfied are you with the quality of this mission statement? (is it clear? Is it inspiring?) Don’t know and/or not satisfied = 0
Very satisfied = 5
2 Do you feel your PPD is formally recognized by public institutions? And do you experience a positive attitude of these institutions towards your partnership? No recognition and negative attitude = 0 Highly recognized/ positive attitude = 5
Total score =
Structure and participation – How is the PPD structured, does it enable a balanced and effective participation?
# Sub-question Scale Your score
3 Do you know of rules and regulations in the PPD and if so, how satisfied are you with these rules considering your own possibilities to participate in the partnership? Don’t know and/or not satisfied = 0
Very satisfied = 5
4 How satisfied are you with your possibilities to participate in decision making within the PPD Not at all = 0
Very satisfied = 5
Total score =
Champion(s) and leadership – Has the PPD identified champions, and how has it tried to leverage them over time to impact the effectiveness of the dialogue process?
# Sub-question Scale Your score
5 Are there clear champions or leaders in your PPD and how satisfied are you with their performance? No champions and/ or not satisfied = 0
Very satisfied = 5
6 Are you satisfied with the continuity of the involvement of these champions or leaders over time? Not satisfied = 0
Very satisfied = 5
Total score =
Facilitation and management – Did the PPD engage suitable facilitators and or managers? How has their role been defined? Have they managed to effectively ensure cohesion and performance? What conflicts did they manage, and how did they resolve these?
# Sub-question Scale Your score
7 Are you satisfied with the performance of facilitators and/or managers in your PPD? Not satisfied = 0
Very satisfied = 5
8 Do you know if your PPD has management arrangements (description of responsibilities, tasks, structure, arrangements etc.) and if so, how satisfied are you with these arrangements? Don’t know and/or not satisfied = 0
Very satisfied = 5
Total score =
Outputs – What outputs does the PPD produce, and under what internal processes? Have outputs from the PPD contributed to agreed private sector development outcomes in the shape of structure and process outputs, analytical outputs or recommendations?
# Sub-question Scale Your score
9 Are you satisfied with the amount and quality of proposals that have been produced by your PPD for external parties (e.g. government, ministries, public institutions)? Not satisfied = 0
Very satisfied = 5
10 Do you think your PPD has had influence on changing laws, rules and regulations or changes in structure and behavior of public institutions? No influence whatsoever = 0
Very much = 5
Total score =
Outreach and communication – Has the PPD communication enabled a shared vision and understanding through the development of a common language and built trust among stakeholders?
# Sub-question Scale Your score
11 How well do think that you can communicate with the other participants (from other organizations) in your PPD? Very poor = 0
Very well = 5
12 How well do you think external parties (the government, the general public) are informed about your PPD through external communication, awareness raising and marketing activities of your PPD? Not at all = 0
Very well = 5
Total score =
Monitoring – Is there regular reporting on the process, activities, outputs and outcomes of the PPD and providing follow-up actions to problems identified in these reports?
# Sub-question Scale Your score
13 Do you know if the activities, outputs and outcomes are being monitored and reported and if so how satisfied are you with the quality of these monitoring reports Don’t know and/or not satisfied = 0
Very satisfied = 5
14 Do you think monitoring reports have resulted in changes in planning (setting targets) and activities in your PPD? Never = 0
All the time = 5
Total score =
Sub-national– Has the dialogue been conducted at all levels of decision making down to the most local possible level involving micro-entrepreneurs, SMEs and local stakeholders?
# Sub-question Scale Your score
15 Does your PPD consult with local stakeholders affected by it and if so how satisfied are you with the amount and quality of these local consultations? No and/or not satisfied = 0
Very satisfied = 5
16 Does your PPD organize activities to reach out to stakeholders at the local, regional or national levels and if so, how satisfied are you with the participation and involvement of these stakeholders in these activities? No activities and/or not satisfied = 0
Very satisfied
Total score =
Sector Specific – Have sector-specific or issue-specific public-private dialogues been encouraged?
# Sub-question Scale Your score
17 How satisfied are with actions and decisions in the PPD to address specific problems you are facing? Not satisfied = 0
Very satisfied = 5
18 How satisfied are you with the capacity of the PPD to generate concrete solutions to your specific problems? Not satisfied = 0
Very satisfied = 5
Total score =
International Role – Does the PPD represent and promote national and regional interests of both public and private actors in international negotiations and international dialogue processes?
# Sub-question Scale Your score
19 How often do participants in your PPD partnership participate in international forums and conferences on private sector development related issues? Never = 0
Frequently = 5
20 How often is your PPD contacted by international actors with a request for information about your activities? Never = 0
Frequently = 5
Total score =
Post-conflict/crisis recovery/reconciliation – Has the PPD contributed to consolidate peace and rebuild the economy through private sector development in post-conflict and crisis environments – including post-natural disaster
# Sub-question Scale Your score
21 How well do you think is your PPD able to recognize (possible) conflicts, put them on the agenda and resolve them? Not at all = 0
Very well = 5
22 Do you think your PPD has been able to make contributions to resolve conflicts and to build peace in its external environment? No never = 0
Frequently = 5
Total score =
Development Partners – How dependent is the PPD from the input and support of donors? How has the donor agenda impacted the decisions of the PPD?
# Sub-question Scale Your score
23 What is your opinion of the degree of dependence of the PPD on financial support of development partners? (Does more than 50% of the budget comes from external donors?) Very much (the entire budget) = 0
Not much (and much less than 50%) = 5
24 How much influence do you experience of development partners in the planning and agenda’s of your PPD? Very much and at all meetings = 0
No influence at all = 5
Total score =

Evaluation whell questionnaire to stakeholders

  • Download >> DOC (104k)

    Table of Contents

    ANNEX D1: Sample structure for terms of reference for a PPD evaluation

    ANNEX D2: Most Significant Change interviews – Interview format

    ANNEX D3: Most Significant Change interviews – Interview template

    ANNEX D4: Instructions for drawing the evaluation wheel

    ANNEX D5: Evaluation wheel questionnaire to stakeholders

    ANNEX D6: Evaluation wheel – template

    Rights & Permissions

    The material in this work is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The sponsors of the work encourage dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission promptly.

    For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, www.copyright.com. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the World Bank, DFID or the OECD Development Center.

    ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
    Small and Medium Enterprise Department
    The World Bank Group

    Latest Tweets

    • Loading tweets...

    Follow @PPDialogue

    In Partnership With

    CIPE World Bank Group International Finance Corporation DfID GIZ OECD

    About | Legal | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

    All Rights Reserved © 2016

    Copyright © 2023 · Genesis Sample Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in